2025jan31 Soft landing “Yea !” BUT issue is prices 2025mar29
Inflation has cooled substantially since peaking in the summer of 2022, and that progress continued through 2024 to the point where an elusive “soft landing”— price stability without having the economy tank into a recession — remained achievable as Joe Biden wrapped up his presidency. https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/31/economy/us-pce-inflation-consumer-spending-december/index.html
No matter what some people will tell you, tariffs are, in fact, taxes. When you combine the potential tariff rates that the Trump administration could impose on us, the consumer, with the inflation that raged out of control coming out of the pandemic, it feels like things have gotten away from us. Take a look at a recent report from the nonpartisan Tax Foundation. It estimates that under President Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs, the effective tariff rate will be 8% in 2025. That’s so high that it would go off the page if you were charting tariff rates over the last 55 years. The issue is that prices have already gotten much more expensive over the last five years because of heightened inflation. The cumulative inflation rate during that period, according to the Consumer Price Index, has been over 23%. We haven’t had a higher five-year inflation rate in over 30 years. The median five-year inflation rate since the late 1940s is only a bit more than 14%. To say with the grocery store comparison, the price of an average chicken is now over $2 more expensive than it was in February 2020. The price of a loaf of white bread is $0.50 more expensive. A pound of ground beef is over $1.50 more expensive. https://view.newsletters.cnn.com/messages/174319932680379ccdba37d2f/raw?utm_source=cnn_What+Matters+for+March+28%2C+2025&utm_medium=email&bt_ee=pM2vO%2Bz8XKTi1wmERy3cQFi4U5T1zGGPudJIBV3yNtkHa8gx6IulKSfBSBO7f95g&bt_ts=1743199326805
2024oct09 2024aug22 Soft landing continued
Consumer spending and overall economic growth have held up in the face of high interest rates, which are meant to cool demand and eventually weigh down inflation. But the job market is beginning to weaken. Revisions released this week showed that employers hired fewer workers in 2023 and early 2024 than was previously reported. The unemployment rate rose to 4.3 percent in July, up from 4.1 percent in June and 3.5 percent a year earlier. The latest jump could be a fluke — a hurricane messed with the data — but it could also be an early warning that the economy is hurtling toward the brink of a recession. That makes this a critical moment for the Fed. Officials have held interest rates at a two-decade high of 5.3 percent for a full year. Now, as they try to secure a soft and gentle economic landing, they are preparing to take their foot off the brake. Policymakers are widely expected to begin lowering rates at their meeting in September. Mr. Powell could use his speech to confirm that a rate cut is imminent. But most economists think that he will avoid detailing just how much and how quickly rates are likely to drop. Fed officials will receive a fresh jobs report on Sept. 6, providing a clearer idea of how the economy is shaping up before their Sept. 17-18 meeting. Instead, Mr. Powell’s speech could underscore just how much two years have changed things. In 2022, he pledged to do what it took to lower rapid inflation. This time, he could make it clear that the Fed’s focus is now much more balanced. Central bankers want to keep inflation cooling, but with today’s price increases at much more benign levels, they are eager to avoid pummeling the labor market and economy in the process. “This is his narrative-setting speech,” said Julia Coronado, founder of MacroPolicy Perspectives. “The overall narrative is: We are going to do whatever it takes to keep this soft landing going.” https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/22/business/economy/jerome-powell-fed-jackson-hole.html
“If we want a soft landing, we can’t be behind the curve,” Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee said in September. “Of course, getting the timing right at moments of transition is maybe the hardest challenge a central bank faces. It’s especially hard at a moment like this where conditions are so different from previous cycles. But knowing that labor markets tend to deteriorate quickly when they turn and that monetary policy takes time to act, it’s just not realistic to wait until problems show up,” he added. https://thehill.com/business/4924679-fed-shrugs-off-downturn-concerns-in-latest-minutes/
2024aug23 He then added: “We will do everything we can to support a strong labor market as we make further progress toward price stability.” https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/23/business/economy/fed-rates-powell-jackson-hole.html Jobs are #1 politically.
2024aug30 The Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation measure continued to gradually cool overall in June even as a “core” inflation measure held steady, likely enough evidence of progress to keep the central bank on track for a rate cut later this year but not enough to stoke speculation that it might reduce rates at its meeting next week. The Personal Consumption Expenditures index was 2.5 percent higher in June than a year earlier, slower than May’s 2.6 percent and in line with economist expectations, fresh data released on Friday showed. A “core” price measure that strips out food and fuel costs for a better sense of the underlying inflation trend proved slightly more stubborn. Yearly core inflation was 2.6 percent, matching its reading in May. And on a monthly basis, both measures of inflation climbed modestly. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/26/business/economy/federal-reserve-inflation-cooled.html
2025jan30 Vote winner, yet lowest job performance.
Gallup noted that the 47 percent Trump scored is better than the average rating during his first term, when he earned a 41 percent approval from Americans. He was the only president to not receive a job rating of 50 percent or higher during his time in office. https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5116132-trump-approval-rating-gallup/
Trump Kicks Congress to the Curb, With Little Protest From Republicans. The administration is showing it doesn’t view the House and Senate as equal partners. So far, Republicans, who hold both majorities, are accepting their new status. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/30/us/politics/trump-congress-republicans.html
2025jan30 At the height of American progress for its citizens, come the looters.
Lara Cohen, who left her post after Musk’s takeover as Twitter’s global head of marketing and partners, said in a Threads post Tuesday. “They come in, get no context, turn off everything without knowing who does what… That was a social media company. This is the country and this will hurt people beyond repair.” On the campaign trail, Musk talked frequently about downsizing the federal government. And he played an integral part in the rollout of Tuesday’s federal government buyouts, an official told CNN, through his position leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). And it makes sense why Trump would be on board with such a plan, said William Klepper, a professor of management at Columbia Business School. “Trump is used to being in a reality show, right? He’s used to firing people. That’s a script that he has,” Klepper said. But one environment is not necessarily like the other. “Government is not business,” he said. “In business, the winning formula is the one that results in providing greater value to customers than your competitors and gives you superior profitability. In government, it’s a different perspective, for the most part you (trying to) create greater value for your constituents in terms of what you’re offering them in programming and services.” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt sidestepped a question Wednesday from CNN about Musk’s involvement in the buyout, instead saying Musk’s work at DOGE has been “incredibly productive.” On Wednesday, Musk claimed in an X post that, “Downsizing government is the most popular issue by far!” The post referenced a Reuters/Ipsos poll that mainly shows opposition to Trump’s executive orders but says that 44% of Americans support ending government “diversity, equity and inclusion” initiatives. The Twitter takeover playbook The day before Musk closed his $44 billion deal to buy Twitter, which he’s re-dubbed X, he walked through the front door with a toilet. Starting within hours of his takeover the following day, Musk took something like a hacksaw to the company, moves that he said were essential to “save” the company but that caused chaos. The billionaire laid off a majority of the company’s staff — and then had to ask dozens of workers to return. He ordered the closure of at least one data center — and the platform experienced numerous glitches and outages in the following months. Elon Musk’s X is worth nearly 80% less than when he bought it, Fidelity estimates He slashed the company’s safety teams, dismantled content moderation policies and welcomed White supremacists and misinformation peddlers back to the platform — and many users and advertisers fled. The company was sued by landlords and vendors who accused it of failing to pay up for rent or agreed upon services. And it was investigated by San Francisco city officials for putting up an illegal sign and over reports that Musk’s team had set up bedrooms in office spaces. Those and other controversial moves by the world’s richest man — among them, using the site to boost racist conspiracy theories — have by most accounts turned what was once one of the world’s most important and influential sources of real-time information into a more toxic, less reliable and less useful place and fueled the emergence of several competing platforms. (Still, Musk and the company’s other leaders continue to refer to X as a global town square.) And since Musk’s takeover, the company’s value has fallen by about 80%, Fidelity estimated last fall. Still, while the takeover may have hurt Twitter employees, users, advertisers and – at least in one sense — Musk’s own pocketbook, it has also added to his own personal power. Over the summer, Musk used X to try to sway public opinion in favor of Trump. And since Trump’s reelection, Musk now has the president’s ear and an office in the White House — and he’s become tens of billions of additional dollars richer, on the back of expectations that his connection to Trump will benefit his empire of companies. And for that reason, he may have little incentive to change his employment – and layoff – strategy in his new role at DOGE. https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/29/tech/elon-musk-government-cuts-twitter-takeover/index.html In his career, Harv has been there, done that, however in a gentler way. Seeing what’s happening, Harv, for his future, flees to Walt Disney World, to escape the tribulation of what is happening. What is happening is not good, thus Harv flees (looks / builds) to a better life. And he will vote again and again for the good soul that is now a several thousand years in American history. The looters continue to beat on and at the law, and of late have beaten the law in broad terms as Harv still sees that American-love of his elementry youth where his thought was “This American-love (constitution) is designed to perform better than religion-love - both born of and bettered by individuals.”
2025jan20 DAVOS
U.S. presidential inauguration takes place the same day as the start of the World Economic Forum here in the Swiss Alps. But it’s not just timing and frigid temperatures that link the two events. For years, the gathering at Davos has been shorthand for the prevailing political orthodoxy — an assembly of well-heeled elites and corporate power brokers who exulted in the dogmas of globalization and cloaked themselves in the bromides of a liberal age. As the stereotype went, they loved open borders (at least for big business), privileged cosmopolitan connections over national allegiance and moved hand-in-hand with a class of technocrats in the West’s political establishment that had grown steadily more distant from the voters who put them in power. Davos bigwigs recognize the awkwardness of the moment. “We are in the middle of two orders,” Borge Brende, the president of the World Economic Forum, said during a briefing with reporters last week. The “post-Cold War” era — marked by a liberal triumphalism and an embrace of globalization that’s now in retreat — is over, Brende suggested, “and now it’s an unruly time because we don’t know what the new order will be.” https://s2.washingtonpost.com/camp-rw/?trackId=598b051fae7e8a68162a1429&s=678ddaae7402a8797937efb4&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=wp_todays_worldview&linknum=5&linktot=73 The characteristics of the elites will shape the ‘will be’, ie, felon, liar, bully, …
the oligarchs
2025jan23 The president's comments on the oil price came after he spoke to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on Wednesday. According to Saudi State media Bin Salman pledged to invest as much as $600bn in the US over the next four years, however this figure was not mentioned in the White House statement after the call. Despite the cordial exchange, Trump said he would be asking "the Crown Prince, who's a fantastic guy, to round it out to around $1tn". The price of crude fell by 1% following Trump's comments. According to David Oxley, Chief Climate and Commodities Economist at Capital Economics these comments are in keeping with Trump's desire for lower gasoline prices. "[It's] his clear intention to use energy as leverage over Russia to end the war in Ukraine. That said, lower oil prices will certainly not incentivise US oil producers to "drill, baby, drill" – particularly in high-cost Alaska." "Of course, Saudi Arabia would not be guaranteed to heed a request by President Trump to expand oil production and to bring down global oil prices." The US president's appearance via video at the World Economic Forum marked his first address to a global audience since his inauguration earlier this week. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c17ewl98kgvo
President Joe Biden’s pointed warning about the U.S. becoming an “ oligarchy ” of tech billionaires will be illustrated at Donald Trump’s inauguration, when the world’s three richest men will sit on the dais as Trump is sworn in for a second term. Elon Musk, the world’s wealthiest person, took an unprecedented, hands-on role in the final stretch of Trump’s campaign, spending some $200 million through a super PAC. Musk has a new role reshaping government in the upcoming administration and will be joined on the dais by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos. Both men’s companies have enormous contracts with the federal government. https://apnews.com/article/oligarchy-musk-bezos-zuckerberg-trump-biden-altman-putin-3ade224cccfb287f7fadaeac42b76e3d
Viktor Pinchuk, an influential Ukrainian oligarch who is a fixture at events on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and is keen to rally support against Russia. https://s2.washingtonpost.com/camp-rw/?trackId=598b051fae7e8a68162a1429&s=67931f8d86a16346eb4e4825&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=wp_todays_worldview&linknum=5&linktot=59
2025jan25 World leaders, the bosses of the world's biggest companies and a sprinkling of celebrities gathered in the small Swiss mountain town of Davos for the annual World Economic Forum this week. On the other side of the Atlantic, President Donald Trump was starting his political comeback as the new US president. "Nothing will stand in our way", he declared, as he vowed to end America's "decline". https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq5g3y6dxzgo
2025jan25 Broadly, the US is seen as a world-leading hegemon that does as it pleases and gets treated quite well, Fareed says. By haranguing other countries for discounts—most of them friends, allies and partners—Trump threatens the peaceful and prosperous international system in which the US has thrived, Fareed argues. https://view.newsletters.cnn.com/messages/173789831553462bd3b39d8d6/raw?utm_source=cnn_Fareed%27s+Global+Briefing%2C+Jan.+26%2C+2025&utm_medium=email&bt_ee=g2V0aFWagfICHnK%2FQ6jYM4KQHUymQEXnXtv%2FhTxh2v2KFE5tE8T92VkWx3ITeRhC&bt_ts=1737898315537
2025jan05 remember Carter
The election of Democrat Jimmy Carter as President in 1976 brought a new emphasis, based on Carter’s personal ideology, to U.S. foreign policy. Carter believed that the nation’s foreign policy should reflect its highest moral principles—a definite break with the policy and practices of the Nixon Administration. In 1977, Carter said, “For too many years, we’ve been willing to adopt the flawed and erroneous principles and tactics of our adversaries, sometimes abandoning our own values for theirs. We’ve fought fire with fire, never thinking that fire is sometimes best quenched with water. This approach failed, with Vietnam the best example of its intellectual and moral poverty. But through failure we have now found our way back to our own principles and values, and we have regained our lost confidence.” Carter refused to continue the past practice of overlooking the human rights abuses of our own allies, and was particularly tough on South Korea, Iran, Argentina, South Africa, and Rhodesia (Zimbabwe). He also ended more than 30 years of U.S. political and military support to one of Latin America’s most abusive leaders—President Somoza of Nicaragua. Carter clearly defined the foundation of his foreign policy: “Our policy is based on an historical vision of America’s role. Our policy is derived from a larger view of global change. Our policy is rooted in our moral values, which never change. Our policy is reinforced by our material wealth and by our military power. Our policy is designed to serve mankind.” Initially, the diplomatic initiatives of President Carter and Secretary Vance were quite successful. In 1978, the Administration completed the process begun during the Nixon Administration and normalized relations with mainland China. President Carter himself facilitated the Camp David Peace Accords between Israel and Egypt, which paved the way for new progress in the Middle East and an end to the long-running hostilities between the two sides. Carter and Vance also persuaded the Senate to consent to a treaty promising to return the Panama Canal to Panamanian control by 1999. In 1979, President Carter and Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev signed a follow-on nuclear arms control agreement, known as SALT II. Carter’s new emphasis on human rights led to a Congressional requirement for the annual submission by the Department of State of “a full and complete report” on human rights practices around the world. The first volume of the Country Reports on Human Rights Practices covered the year 1976 and was released in 1977. In less than 300 pages, the report analyzed the situation in 82 countries. In contrast, 195 individual reports were included in the volume for the year 2000, covering virtually every country in the world, and the overall report was about 6,000 pages long. https://history.state.gov/departmenthistory/short-history/carter
https://www.wsj.com/us-news/how-to-chronic-homelessness-crisis-0ea33dad?mod=djemwhatsnews
… Donald Trump solidified the educational divide that has defined his era. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/11/15/educational-divide-american-politics-trump/?utm_campaign=wp_news_alert_revere_trending_now&utm_medium=email&utm_source=alert&location=alert
2024nov16. Jeffries (Pelosi) House briefing v Trump ‘mandate’
2024nov13 Dark Matter
Since we can't see dark matter, how can we study it? There are two main approaches. Astronomers analyze its distribution by observing material clustering and object motion in the universe. Meanwhile, particle physicists aim to detect the fundamental particles that compose dark matter. Back on Earth, beneath a mountain in Italy, the LNGS's XENON1Tis hunting for signs of interactions after WIMPs collide with xenon atoms. "A new phase in the race to detect dark matter with ultra-low background massive detectors on Earth has just begun with XENON1T," project spokesperson Elena Aprile, a professor at Columbia University, said in a statement. "We are proud to be at the forefront of the race with this amazing detector, the first of its kind." The Large Underground Xenon dark-matter experiment (LUX), seated in a gold mine in South Dakota, has also been hunting for signs of WIMP and xenon interactions. But so far, the instrument hasn't revealed the mysterious matter. https://www.space.com/20930-dark-matter.html
Trump’s team is determined to get a fast start after learning the lessons of his chaotic first term, especially since the Republican monopoly on Washington power may only last two years. Swift border reforms, huge tax cuts and new incentives for oil exploration are already on deck. https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/14/politics/trump-california-fires-analysis/index.html
2024dec16 Trump 2.0 storm clouds
America has seen this movie before. In the 2017 version, at the start of Trump’s first term as president, the GOP similarly controlled Congress and had difficulty making progress. https://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/juan-williams/5039884-trump-agenda-first-100-days/
Trump moves his entire $4 billion stake in Truth Social into his trust ahead of White House move. Trump has also nominated several Truth Social board chairs to his administration, including professional wrestling mogul Linda McMahon as Secretary of Education, and conspiracy theorist Kash Patel as the next director of the FBI. Trump Media CEO Devin Nunes has also been selected to chair the incoming president’s intelligence advisory board. https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-truth-social-trust-ethics-plan-b2667959.html
Trump's shutdown gamble exposes limits of his power. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3e3p3nx3kno
Both Rubio and Waltz are hawkish lawmakers who, on paper, aren’t wholly aligned with Trump’s “America First” brand. Their anticipated ascension spurred disquiet in some corners of Trumpworld, where many want to turn the page on an era of Republican foreign policy dominated by trigger-happy neoconservatives. Within Republican circles, there are pronounced disagreements over a range of issues. Trump and Vice President-elect JD Vance have been bluntly skeptical about the need to support Ukraine’s ongoing war effort, while many Republicans in Congress are more aligned with the Biden administration’s project in buttressing NATO and Western efforts to back Kyiv. There are divisions over how and where to prioritize U.S. power, whether to view the challenge of China in principally economic or military terms, and over Trump’s protectionist zeal, which flies in the face of decades of pro-free trade Republican orthodoxy. https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/5061034831056916264/3504945360753274345
2024nov07 one Trump paragraph by New York Times
The New York Times’ Shane Goldmacher, Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan describe its arc: “He overcame seemingly fatal political vulnerabilities—four criminal indictments, three expensive lawsuits, conviction on 34 felony counts, endless reckless tangents in his speeches—and transformed at least some of them into distinct advantages. How he won in 2024 came down to one essential bet: that his grievances could meld with those of the MAGA movement, and then with the Republican Party, and then with more than half the country. His mug shot became a best-selling shirt. His criminal conviction inspired $100 million in donations in one day. The images of him bleeding after a failed assassination attempt became the symbol of what supporters saw as a campaign of destiny. ... Voters unhappy with the nation’s direction turned him into a vessel for their rage.” https://view.newsletters.cnn.com/messages/1731013505958cac470b7e2f1/raw?utm_source=cnn_Fareed%27s+Global+Briefing%2C+Nov.+7%2C+2024&utm_medium=email&bt_ee=GXVl92XZz5wyypBnuP%2BeTQ6XJyfT3djdDO%2BGryIwXqvswkqP7m3SEFBIILKALe3s&bt_ts=1731013505961
2024nov07 personality trumped policy
2024nov04 Democrats can’t nix Trump
The Democrats’ challenge appears to be part of a broader trend of political struggles for ruling parties across the developed world. Voters appear eager for change when they get the chance. The ruling parties in Britain, Germany, Italy, Australia and most recently Japan all faced electoral setbacks or lost power. Mr. Trump himself lost four years ago. France and Canada might well join the list. Nearly everywhere, high prices and the fallout from the pandemic left voters angry and resentful. It discredited ruling parties — and many of them weren’t especially popular at the outset. In the United States, post-pandemic disillusionment and frustration took a toll on Democrats. The party championed a tough response to the virus, including mask and vaccine mandates, school closures and lockdowns. It had backed the Black Lives Matter movement, argued for a more liberal border policy, sought to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and spent trillions on stimulus. As the pandemic ended, all of this quickly became a liability. More than at any time over the last 16 years, Democrats are playing defense on the issues. They’ve moved to the right on immigration, energy and crime. They de-emphasized the traditional liberal push to expand the society safety net, which was eclipsed by the urgency to reduce prices. Whatever the outcome, a long period of liberal ascendancy in American politics might be waning. Democrats won the popular vote in four straight presidential elections. When they held full control of government, they enacted the Affordable Care Act, Dodd-Frank and the CHIPS Act; they saved the auto industry and spent billions on renewable energy, infrastructure and more. Over just the last few years, all of this liberal energy suddenly seemed to vanish. The backlash against pandemic restrictions and the woke left gradually went mainstream, and even divided liberal institutions. Trust in the media, “experts” and scientists plunged. Younger Americans took to social media — perhaps with the help of algorithmic changes — to vent their frustrations with an aging president, high prices, lost opportunity and anger at a system that wasn’t working for them. At the same time, the events that followed the pandemic took a serious toll on the case for liberalism, whatever the precise merits of the arguments. Inflation and high interest rates could be blamed on high government spending stimulating excessive demand. High gas prices could be blamed on suspending drilling permits and the termination of the Keystone pipeline project. A surge of migrants could be blamed on the administration’s looser border policy, which became politically untenable; homelessness, crime and disorder made the case for “law and order.” On issue after issue, Democrats have responded by moving to the right. Most obviously, Ms. Harris had to back away from positions she took when the progressive cultural ascendancy was near its peak in 2019 — a ban on fracking, Medicare for all and so on. But the Democratic shift isn’t simply about backing away from positions taken during a Democratic primary. Across the board, Democrats have de-emphasized policies they preached with confidence to a general electorate only a few years ago. This rightward shift is evident in party identification as well. This year, high-quality polls found that the nearly two-decade-long Democratic advantage in party identification evaporated or even reversed. This year, the biggest names in political polling — Pew Research, Gallup, NBC/WSJ, Times/Siena, and so on — have all found the Republicans edging ahead of the Democrats for the first time since 2004, if ever. If it weren’t for Mr. Trump’s liabilities, it’s easy to imagine how Republicans could have won decisively in the manner of a “change” election, like in 1980 or 2008, when American politics lurched left or right with lasting consequences. Mr. Trump might still do so, but clearly his challenges will make it harder in important ways. If Mr. Trump wins, this will be the likeliest explanation, rather than his own political popularity. After a period of Democratic predominance, the upheaval during and after the pandemic, along with the response, left too many voters disillusioned with Democrats, and unwilling to give the party another chance — despite their serious reservations about Mr. Trump. If he loses, the explanation will be equally simple: It was his own conduct on Jan. 6 and the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe that cost him a winnable election. In that event, a Harris victory still might not augur well for the hopes of progressives. Oddly, it is easiest to imagine a reinvigorated liberalism if Mr. Trump wins the presidency, and refuels the tank of anti-Trump fervor once more. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/02/upshot/democrats-trump-election.html
Trump works to control the media — Musk, Bezos, …
Mr. Musk bought X, then known as Twitter, for $44 billion in 2022, vowing to make it a public town square. He swiftly became the most powerful super-user on the site. Mr. Musk overtook former President Barack Obama in March 2023 to become the most-followed person on the platform, with 133 million followers. Since then, his count has risen 52 percent. Mr. Obama’s following, in contrast, has decreased slightly, by about two million, to just over 131 million followers. (Bot accounts exist on X and may be a factor in some of the tallies.) https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/03/technology/elon-musk-x-election.html
2024nov01 I-SELF IS ALONE — plan on it
Voyager 1, which launched in 1977, ventured into interstellar space in 2012, becoming the first spacecraft to cross the boundary of our solar system. Its time in deep space has taken a toll on its instruments and caused an increasing number of technical issues. Earlier this year, the team had to fix a separate communications glitch that was causing the spacecraft to transmit gibberish. While spacecraft's advanced age and distance from Earth [After sending instructions to Voyager 1 on Oct. 16, the team expected to receive data back from the spacecraft within a couple of days; it normally takes about 23 hours for a command to travel more than 15 billion miles (24 billion kilometers) to reach the spacecraft in interstellar space, and then another 23 hours for the flight team on Earth to receive a signal back.] can make maintenance challenging, Voyager 1 continues to return vital data from beyond the solar system. https://www.space.com/space-exploration/missions/voyager-1-spacecraft-phones-home-with-transmitter-that-hasnt-been-used-since-1981?utm_term=2A6CF76F-CCFC-4561-9190-9AEC1F8B1CF4&lrh=9a18118e64ac886183a1f61de74720d43b1343700b8a12e015ddf73957378e06&utm_campaign=58E4DE65-C57F-4CD3-9A5A-609994E2C5A9&utm_medium=email&utm_content=B0D4DAD1-DAA3-4E5C-8A86-71545CA77862&utm_source=SmartBrief